GET FREE E-MAIL UPDATES: SEND US YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS WITH SUBSCRIBE IN THE SUBJECT LINE
or subscribe to our
Twitter service

UNDERNEWS

Undernews is the online report of the Progressive Review, edited by Sam Smith, who covered Washington during all or part of ten of America's presidencies and who has edited alternative journals since 1964. The Review, which has been on the web since 1995, is now published from Freeport, Maine. We get over 5 million article visits a year. See prorev.com for full contents of our site

November 28, 2009

HOW TO CONTROL HEALTH COSTS

Jon Walker, Fire Dog Lake

1. A minimum medical loss ratio for insurance companies mandating that they spend at least 90 cents of every dollar they take in as premiums on health care. This is based on the crazy idea that health insurance should insure people’s health instead of corporate profits.

2. Turn all health insurances companies into non-profits. Most countries that are not single payer (Switzerland, Germany, Belgium) require all basic health insurance plans to be non-profits.

3. On the new exchanges, create a much stronger risk adjustment mechanism, like in the Netherlands, to encourage competition on quality and cost effectiveness, instead of the cherry picking of healthy customers.

4. Allow undocumented immigrants to buy health insurance on the new exchange with their own money. It will increase the size of the risk pool and reduce the cost of uncompensated care in this country.

5. On the new exchanges, use more tightly defined benefit packages, and define plan levels based on deductible and co-pay size, instead of actuarial value. This will simplify comparison shopping and encourage the selection of more cost-effective HMO’s, instead of PPO’s

6. Allow for drug re-importation. People in every other first world country pay much less for the same prescription drugs. Let Americans buy these cheaper drugs from Canada or Europe.

7. Allow Medicare to directly negotiate lower drug prices. Medicare Part D was one of the biggest corporate giveaways in American history. Allow Medicare to use its size (as the VA system does) to directly negotiate for lower drug prices for seniors.

8. Eliminate direct-to-consumer drug advertising. It only increases the unnecessary use of medicine.

9. Follow the FTC recommendation by providing shorter exclusivity periods for biosimilars. The current bills create an extremely long 12-year exclusivity period. Going with the FTC recommendations will increase the availability of much cheaper generic versions of life saving biologics.

10. Create a robust public option that can use Medicare rates and Medicare’s provider network.

11. Create a single provider reimbursement negotiator like basically every other industrialized nation. The lack of this is the single biggest reason why, as a nation, we pay several times what other countries do for the same procedure.

12. Create a fully integrated, government-run health care HMO, based on the VA health care system, which would be an insurance option for all Americans.

13. Finally, adopt a Medicare-for-all single-payer system for everyone in the country.

These ideas are not radical or untested. All of them (except the exclusionary period for biosimilars) are being used in this country and/or other countries to reduce cost. These are all proven cost control solutions. Implementing all or most of these ideas would save our country trillions on health care over the next decade.

I know the Obama administration is aware of these cost saving ideas because several of them (drug reimportation, direct Medicare drug price negotiation, robust public option) where part of his campaign’s health care plan. Obama traded away most of these cost saving reforms to PhRMA and other industry lobbies in exchange for campaign ads. If you trade away most of the cost controlling reforms to bring the different industries on board, you have no right to go around complaining when people say your reform plan does not do enough to control cost.


4 Comments:

Anonymous BARB said...

Brother belongs to VA health insurance program, and sister belongs to Medicare program. Both siblings say their "government" run plans are lousy. I have private insurance. I am happy with the insurance I have.

November 29, 2009 9:20 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The people who criticize U.S. government health programs are generally the ones who do all in their power to cripple, hobble, and defund those programs to be sure they can't produce the generally high levels of satisfaction with the publically run or regulated health systems in most developed countries.

My wife and I are on Medicare and are generally quite satisfied with it. We are not, however, at all satisfied with the structure of the health industry in the U.S. that leaves 45 million fellow citizens without health care and all of us vulnerable to cancellations if we develop serious, costly illnesses. We are also not satisfied with a system that provides stupendous profits for insurance and pharmaceutical companies and enormous funding for lobbying, buying votes, and advertising by insurance companies.

November 30, 2009 3:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Author prorev.com !
It was specially registered at a forum to tell to you thanks for support.

December 3, 2009 10:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I want to quote your post in my blog. It can?
And you et an account on Twitter?

December 25, 2009 7:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home