FLOTSAM & JETSAM: TIME FOR A LITTLE MODERATION
After nine months of political extremism - bankrolling huge banks, escalating the Afghan war, treating local public schools like they were just another federal agency and finding new ways to subsidize the health insurance industry - it may finally be time for a little moderation. There's an awful lot of talk about moderation and bipartisanship in Washington, but not much evidence of it. So here is a political program that would be both more moderate and more popular than that of our bipartited president and Congress:
WARS
Just stop them. They're not doing us any good. We don't win them, they cost a lot of money, make a lot of people mad at us, and kill people who in no way deserve it. And if you can't stop them, at least stop escalating them. Remember: every new soldier sent to Afghanistan is one more problem you'll have to add to your exit strategy.
A major reason we have so many wars is because of pressure from former schoolyard bullies now at the Pentagon and from presidential advisers and journalists feeling insecure about their testosterone level. Stop pandering to these types and you not only save a lot of lives, but hundreds of billions of dollars as well.
HEALTH CARE
The Democrats have blown it. So why not drop the whole thing and come up with a moderate health reform bill. One that would do some of the things that everyone would like - like barring denial of insurance for preexisting conditions. Then expand Medicare to those 55 and older and to children 5 and under. Expand Medicaid. You can get your money from TARP and from the Pentagon. There's lots of it floating around these days for bankers and Afghanis. Why not use it for a good purpose instead? Sure the insurance companies will be furious, but who cares? Mike Huckabee has already come within spitting distance of Obama in two polls and sucking up to Blue Cross won't help Obama a bit.
PUBLIC WORKS
One difference between Washington politicians and real people is that the latter like to see public works; the former settle for infrastructure. Further, the stimulus bill was so full of verbal infrastructure that people didn't notice how little public works there was in it. We don't need a second stimulus package; we need a real first one. For a model, look at Roosevelt's administration which built or repaired 3,700 playgrounds, 40,000 schools, 12 million feet of sewer pipe, 1,000 airports, 2,500 hospitals, 2,500 sports stadiums, 3,900 schools, 8,192 parks, 15,000 playgrounds, 124,031 bridges and 125,110 public buildings, not to mention thousands of miles of roads. And Harry Hopkins got the same number of people working in four weeks as Obama promised he would in two years. In fact, Hopkins got about the same number of people working in four weeks as Obama has lost so far this year.
ECONOMIC PROGRAMS
The Democrats have done hardly anything to put a dent in the foreclosure crisis. One reason is because they like banks too much. The other is that they're afraid that helping those in foreclosure or in danger of it will annoy others who say, "I've paid my mortgage; why haven't they?" Two ways to deal with this: decentralize foreclosure adjustment decisions to local courts and start a shared equity program in which financial aid would be paid for by a percentage of government ownership. Get this going now, and by the time most of these homes are sold, the government will have actually made money.
Some other things that would help:
Reduce credit card interest rates. End rampant usury.
Expand unemployment benefits
Limit rate increases on adjustable rate mortgages
Create state owned banks like the one that has worked well in North Dakota.
Support the creation of more credit unions and co-ops.
Expand our rail system and rail service - with the emphasis not on business class high speed rail but on everyday service for real people. The expansion of transportation has historically been one of America's great economic spurs.
DRUGS
The war on drugs has been the most deadly conflict for Americans since Vietnam. It has greatly increased criminal drug activity and sends people to prison for using something milder than vodka and less dangerous than cigarettes. If we were to decriminalize the possession of marijuana and cancel all existing marijuana possession charges, we would be starting on the path towards sanity.
RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION
There are at least five amendments that are in deep trouble.
The First Amendment: This is in trouble because it has fewer and fewer powerful advocates. Police intimidate demonstrators, principals harass student newspapers, and liberals pass hate crime bills. Ordinary folks still like the idea, however, and it's a wonderfully moderate concept.
The Second Amendment: Contrary to liberal mythology, gun laws are pretty ineffective. When DC passed the toughest gun law in the country, its murderers failed to notice and the death rate soared. This is partly because if you're about to kill someone, the threat of ancillary gun charges are of minimal significance. There are, on the other hand, places like Alaska and Maine that have high gun ownership and low crime rates. Further, there are Americans who like to hunt, like to feel safe in their house, and believe in their constitutional right to bear arms. Even if you don't agree with them, you're not doing anyone (including yourself) a favor by hassling them. Support their rights and you've may find yourself with allies on actual important issues.
The Fourth Amendment: There is a varied and broad constituency that has been subjected to illegal searches by the government, from wiretaps to warrantless raids.
The Tenth Amendment: This amendment, which leaves to the states and the people those powers not specified in the Constitution, is routinely abused by the feds. Arne Duncan's unconstitutional interference with local public education is but one example. Washington officials of both parties have increasingly sought to secure more power for themselves at the expense of state and local government. Liberals are repeat offenders, some even giving the impression that they hold lower branches of government with contempt. This doesn't win votes. It annoys people, makes their lives more difficult, and leads them to think of you as arrogant.
The Fourteenth Amendment: This amendment, designed after the Civil War to give personhood to former slaves and their descendants, was kidnapped by business interests to include corporations as persons. This is why corporations can get away with buying elections. As Al Gore explained, after an 1886 decision by the Supreme Court, "the 'monopolies in commerce' that Jefferson had wanted to prohibit in the Bill of Rights were full-blown monsters, crushing competition from smaller businesses, bleeding farmers with extortionate shipping costs, and buying politicians at every level of government." Corporations need to lose their personhood.
Five ways to preserve and restore the Constitution. There's nothing more moderate than that.
In fact, all the aforementioned are much closer to the American consensus than much of what is being proposed in Washington, or has been for the past few decades. And there isn't a obfuscating trigger, mandate, option or TARP in the lot.

4 Comments:
"It’s interesting to note that the President’s children have not gotten their shots and the explanation for this is it hasn’t been available to them – now that’s a little bit hard to buy when you think that probably anything the President wants can be available for their children,” said Paul, adding, “So in a way he’s made his decision not to give his children these inoculations – so if he has freedom of choice on this, I would like to make sure that all the American people have the same amount of freedom of choice.”
Ron Paul
Sam, that program makes such eminent good sense that I'm nearly dumbfounded that almost none of it appears on track to be enacted.
It's clear, coherent, practical, and fiscally responsible. In a word, moderate.
But I'm developing a distinct impression that for the Washington political establishment- the people who really run the country- the top priority is building permanent military garrisons in Central Asia and the Middle East. (Now that the megabanks have their bailout, that is.)
This is plainly not what the electoral majority had in mind when the elected Barack Obama and gave Congressional majorities in both houses to the Democrats.
I can't say that I've ever seen the bait and switch game played so blatantly in American politics.
My patience with Obama is nearing an end. He started out with a clear majority of Americans supporting his administration. And nearly any effective executive can pick up another 5-10% of the American people simply by acting decisively and boldly.
But thus far, he's squandered his political capital by alienating his grassroots base- youth and progressive Democrats. And by acquiescing to continuing so many of the policies of George W. Bush, he's repeatedly delighted the Republican opposition- without gaining an iota of respect from them.
The way I characterize the Obama administration's performance thus far is that it's what I would have expected from a Hillary Clinton administration. And that in turn has led me to consider the unpalatable proposition that the actual political agenda of the Beltway Democratic Establishment remains the same, no matter what. With the "front-runners" largely the product of a manufacturing process launched by media exposure and hype, the rivalries for the Democratic presidential nomination revolve around personalities, rather than differing political visions. It's a beauty contest. The Democratic Party establishment seems to want spokesmodels, not chief executives. And what they can't abide is someone with a principled personal vision for how to lead the country.
The Republican Establishment looks upon presidents as front people, too. But they look for people who like to take charge- a quality that's imperative to the traditional job description of the presidency. That is, in fact, what most Americans expect from a president. The Republicans emphasize the role of executive leadership for their presidential candidates over that of negotiator, triangulator, or compromiser. And that emphasis is a clear winner for the Republicans- not only as far as getting their political program enacted, but in terms of popular appeal.
Maybe that's part of the fix being in on the American political scene- the Democratic Party Establishment would rather cut deals with a strong Republican chief executive than contend with a strong, take-charge president from the ranks of their own party. Perhaps because it wouldn't be "their" party, any more...
The thing about public works is that they build a public culture as against corporate culture. The Republicans, however, interpret the government as a super-corporation- somewhat falsely assuming that government is at least as tyrannical as their beloved corporations.
Unfortunately when the U.S. conquered European fascism, it was transformed by it. Whereas Europe has generally said, "been there, done that," the U.S. embraces fascism wholeheartedly,
Post a Comment
<< Home